A PRIMER:for people thaet always think they KNOW how the greeks ACTUALLY thought they do NOT(\\ibid:FAME\\)..xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The end of my deriliction on standardizing MY-self(as a HOLD-out on FOUCAULT). In my personal view, it is in his nice COLLEGE de FRANCE, lectures, where 'e'izs-\shining like DIAMOND. SO: for this AUTHOR two things to note about his first LECTURE"(it is like a mArVeL of GREEK interest in and of itself in this Hermeneutics of the SUBJECTbook)[pictured above for MALK.]\In any case::::when it comes to wondering HOW it is he is ABLE TO navigate the TERRAIN of the INTER-subjective it is ALSO THE CASE thaet thaet is for a GENIUS-level COMPREHENSION(which cannot* simply be DOLED-out as PABLUM-lite)\contrary\:but, when HE SPEAKs ABOUT knowledge and KNOWLEDGE-acts[not only discussed here BUT elaborated to distinction for the eternal watch-club], it is clear very few people can COMPREHEND FOUCAULT when he is mentioning ANYTHING CONCERNING HIS ACTUAL CRITICISM of DESCARTIanISM, let's call it, cause the truth of Foucault is thaet he WAS CLEARLY A GUY IN SPIRIT. If you think he would spend a lifetime sitting in a KEYPAD ENTRY building on fuckin' GRANT money under FLOURESCENT LIGHTS?!you must be mental.......
But when it comes to writing::::a new DEVICEsized READER for publishing WEB-content as WEBPAGES on a cartridge[SHOULD REVIVE the moment we live as a text-centric one and PUT MAYBE ACTORS who seem to understand this world is THEIR ACT alone and they are its ACTED-OUTNESS(cause the world is ACTUALLY::::nothing more thaen a United NATIONS placeholdery for losers to get the stumpJUSTNAILED PERFECT total; everything else is just better on camera)],......
W\w\hich does return this to THE ESSAY HE WROTE TO DELIVER IN CLASS thaet JANUARY 6th, 1982! cause when he mentions thaet there are both 'instrinsic' and 'extrinsic' aspects to understanding* the position of a person vis a vi their COMPREHENSION of a momentary lapse of understanding(cause no trash goes forever unless you realize he's got you in his sights on being a never-ending process of KNOWLEDGE-working, with no SPIRIT or 'transformation in BEING. either'); cause in this momentary lapse let's just say that IS WHAT HAPPENS if you should reside in this world and recline to think a bit about anything or have your WORLD INTERRUPTED and need to amount ITto the same(which IS::::to get purchase on the situation you are FINDING yourself WITHIN)......
And, so like he sayaisz:::(1) there are elements of NATURE 'instrinsic'(he says 'structure', top of p18).), to, and he has this CORRECT though it is HARD TO FATHOM it how::::://///----KNOWING(which is what he says is 'instrinsic to knowledge'; but, if you realize WITHIN 'knowing' you eventually need to PARSE through IMAGES of life;then, and only then, can you understand how detailed the conversation can go(vis a vi these IMAGES' pertaining to the INSCRIPTIBILITY of the one considering THEIR VERY OWN methodological warrent* for success in accessing ANOTHER LIFE-world within which one wants only to be AUTHENTICAL(which is to consider how and why to do anything in its contellation of relatedness to the doing itself(i.e., I treat a tractor a certain way when I AM *actually* a FARMER; which is also to ASK the question WHY AM I NOT A FARMER when I TREAT MY TRACTOR as if I SIMPLY HAVE TO REPAIR IT as a technical DEVICE for the sake of running a farm(((((which is also a way of assuring myself I COMPORT MYSELF with regard to these things AS A FARMER as such, which is MY assuranceof it INFACT)))))).
SO::::getting to the INTRINSIC nature of KNOWING-aboutTHINGS????NOT that hard in the end; great;getting into the EXTRINSICALITIES of KNOWLEDGEingONEself(and, re-knowledgeing, ONE's self(:as a bastard. WHICH IS the total TAKE ON foucauldianism in this world good luck getting a single fuckin' THING OFF THIS GUY he goes already MUCH further then(ibid.lybye()judith dencher. THIS CRIBsheet.